[Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034





------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-07 13:10 EST -------
On QT: the configure bug (missing space before "xno") caused failure to disable
rpath, but shouldn't have caused failure to find Qt. The QT_xxx flags look the
same to me as on my local x86_64 machine.   I need too look at the resulting
config.log file to see what really went wrong.

On boost_python.  I'll change the m4 macro for boost to try to link instead of
looking for a file for the next version.

Fortran is not required, but one of the standard autoconf/automake macros checks
for Fortran.   I suspect AM_LIBTOOL.  Do you know how to turn off the search?

Minuit2, ROOT, and WCSLIB are optional when user builds from tar.gz file.   None
of them are in Core or Extras.   The message that comes out at the end of the
configure step is meant to confirm to user that he got the optional packages he
had hoped for.   Perhaps I should add a message to indicate missing options is ok?

Only the C++ part of the test suite is run with "make check'.   The larger part
(the Python scripts) need manual intervention for the builder to look on the
canvas to verify things.   Should I do something about this?

No I didn't know I didn't have to seperately list the BuildRequires.  I'll fix
that for the next release.

Thanks for you comments.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]