Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2010-01-08 15:46:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > Even if it's a noarch package, it should have ExclusiveArch set so we don't > bother including it in ppc (or other) trees. > > Moreover, Dan's comment stands on how it builds. Might just be simplest to add > the ExclusiveArch and remove the BuildArch. Having the binary rpm as noarch would allow secondary architectures to import the resulting rpms into their kojis and have installable qemu in their repositories. The ExclusiveArch makes sense IMHO for RHEL not in Fedora (no arch besides x86/x86_64). See attachment for a demo spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review