Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #5 from Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-08 16:12:10 EDT --- I can go either way. There is benefit in having the package noarch because things besides kvm can actually use the bios image. That said, having an empty package to facilitate this seems really hackish too. For the python-devel buildrequires, it is actually needed. Testing in mock showed that it would not build without python-devel. The compiler test script uses it. It does not make sense to obsolete bochs-bios or provide it. While kvm 0.12 and newer will only work with seabios, there are other uses for bochs-bios in Fedora {probably not in RHEL}. Both rpms can be installed side by side, and once this package is in the repository kvm will be updated to use and require seabios. Builds were tested in mock for x86_64 and x86. I have a spec update to include the source conventions and directory ownership, just want consensus on the arch issue before it is pushed. FWIW, vgabios is built in a similar fashion, with buildarch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review