Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #63 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-17 14:50:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > Tricky. The thing is that I am not the real upstream author for the majority > of these files. I have bundled them and made their setup and integration > easier for Debian. So in that regard my changes rightly appear in a separate > diff file (the same as if you made the changes). But for you, I am "upstream" > for this repackaging. I _could_ include the patches in the tar file and still > comply with Debian's own package policies (although some in Debian might not > agree) by still keeping the patches under the debian/ directory, in > debian/patches/. > I may do this in the next release. @Peter you are not the real upstream author? Who is the real project owner? Is there another project homepage then this one from Debian? From my point of view, we should avoid the creation of differents "upstreams" tar balls. so it may be nice, if you can work together with the "real" upstream to get a common tar ball in with the huge diff file is integrated. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review