Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #62 from Peter Galbraith <psg@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-16 10:16:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) > The Fedora policies says, that patches which are not Fedora specific should be > forwarded to upstream for integration into the main sources. > > Because the big diff files seams to be a patch which is not Fedora specific, it > may be nice if we can got integrate it into the main sources. > > The advance of integrate the patch into the main sources are: > > 1.) Better maintainmence for the packages > > 2.) Clarification that this is part of the common upstream distribution of the > software Tricky. The thing is that I am not the real upstream author for the majority of these files. I have bundled them and made their setup and integration easier for Debian. So in that regard my changes rightly appear in a separate diff file (the same as if you made the changes). But for you, I am "upstream" for this repackaging. I _could_ include the patches in the tar file and still comply with Debian's own package policies (although some in Debian might not agree) by still keeping the patches under the debian/ directory, in debian/patches/. I may do this in the next release. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review