[Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655





--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-12-16 03:51:34 EDT ---
> > * Can you explain your patch?
> > The original code first searches @INC, then searches the other (IMO
> > questionable) places. As this module's purpose is to first check where RT is
> > installed on a system, your patch IMO is wrong.
> >
> The problem is it tries to use LocalPath from the @INC RT.pm, which is set to
> /usr/local/lib/rt3, thus installing the extension to the wrong place. So I
> create another RT.pm for the installation purpose and force the use of it thru
> the RTHOME envvar. However, the RT.pm from @INC is preferred over the one from
> RTHOME, which is a dubious in my opinion. If one is forcing the use of a
> RTHOME, one would assume this will be the first tried location, hence the
> patch.
> 
Oops, sorry, this is indeed not understandable as is. I'll blame a missing
morning coffee. The RTHOME usage is actually referring to the perl-RTx-Calendar
rpackage (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335), which is making
use of Module::Install::RTx.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]