Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226441 --- Comment #3 from Karel Klíč <kklic@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-10 06:15:19 EDT --- [???] spec file contain source0 http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/dist/sudo-%{version}.tar.gz, but the file has been moved to http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/dist/OLD/sudo-%{version}.tar.gz [YES] source files match upstream: af672524b2c854a67612bf4c743f58b8 sudo-1.7.1.tar.gz [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [YES] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [YES] license text included in package [NO] latest version is being packaged: latest version is sudo 1.7.2 [YES] BuildRequires are proper [YES] compiler flags are appropriate [YES] %clean is present [YES] package builds in mock [YES] debuginfo package looks complete [NO] rpmlint is silent $ rpmlint ./sudo-1.7.1-7.fc13.src.rpm sudo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 70, tab: line 76) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ./sudo-1.7.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm sudo.i686: E: non-readable /etc/sudoers 0440 sudo.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sudo-1.7.1/ChangeLog sudo.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/sudo 0700 sudo.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sudoedit root 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudoedit 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudoedit 04111 sudo.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sudo root 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudo 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudo 04111 sudo.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings. The rpmlint output is appropriate for sudo. [YES] final provides and requires look sane [OK] no %check is present [OK] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package [OK] owns the directories it creates [OK] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [YES] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review