Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-02 14:41:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Thomas! My main reason for packaging bouncycastle was to get iTextSharp [1] included in Fedora. However, ASL 1.1 would make those two libraries incompatible. I sent a mail [2] to bouncycastle csharp development mailing list, asking if it would be possible to relicense the ASL 1.1 bits under ASL 2.0 instead. Anyway, this doesn't prevent from completing mono-bouncycastle review. According to Licensing Guidelines [3], separator between multiple licenses should be 'and', so I changed the License tag to read 'MIT and ASL 1.1'. Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc13.src.rpm [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 [2] http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharpdevmailarchive/msg00370.html [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review