Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Thomas Janssen <thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen <thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-02 14:03:04 EDT --- + rpmlint is fine for a mono package. The permission is needed to run the script. rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm srpm-review-test/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-3.fc13.src.rpm mono-bouncycastle.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-bouncycastle.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-bouncycastle.src: W: strange-permission bccrypto-generate-zip.sh 0755 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. + The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . ! The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Part of the source states: Apache Software License 1.1 (ASL 1.1) The Webpage says: MIT X11 Change the license to: MIT with ASL 1.1 + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file is legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5 d400421918c0c20f2f53fa003e25eb11 + It compiles + ExcludeArch done. + BuildRequires listed. + Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + Package owns all directories that it creates. + Permissions are set properly. + %clean section + Macros usage + The package must contain code, or permissable content. + %doc handling + At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Package will be approved after you corrected the license field. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review