Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-11-30 18:13:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > desktop file - if we create it in prep, we still need a line in %install to > install it. Does that buy us any clarity? Yes, since I find it a bit odd that you still create contents in %install. > library package name - that contains a whole bunch of libSC*.so objects, which > is the primary purpose of that library. Same for the name of the devel package. .. but normally Fedora packages aren't named that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review