[Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983





--- Comment #2 from Eli Wapniarski <eli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-22 02:19:00 EDT ---
OK... Its gonna be obvious now that I'm no developer. I've managed to address
some of the issues as detailed below.

- Split off development libraries to its own package
- Modified licensing in spec file to reflect GPL2 code though docs state that
  qjson licensed under LPGL
- Uncommeted and corrected sed line in this spec file


I'm open to any suggestions and comments you may have regarding the following
issues:

- I have no idea how to run the tests.
- How do I compile the doxygen doc? Can that be done during rpmbuild?
- Since this is a development package, it would probably be best if this
  was a multilib package. How do I accomplish that?
- I thought the %defattr macro conferred ownership to files and directories
  being installed. Please correct me.
- Where can I find an example to properly add FindQJSON.cmake as a requirment?
  Or better yet and quicker if you could detail the correct line.

Looking very forward to your feedback and thankyou very much for your help


Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec
SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]