Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-20 16:46:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 3. are you planning to package the moblin web browser as well? In this case I > > would recommend that moblin-panel-web requires the moblin-web-browser > > (otherwise it just won't do anything... ;-) ) > > Yes, Its in progress and I believe in the mean time it will use the default > browser instead so in the short term it will still be useful when used with > Firefox. I've tested the package on my netbook, but unfortunately when using the URL bar nothing happens at all. I've checked netpanel/moblin-netbook-netpanel.c and it looks like that it tries to start "moblin-web-browser" explicitly. Do you plan to package the moblin-web-browser soon so that both packages can be tested together? ;-) > > 4. regarding the License I'm not sure: the sources in common/ are LGPLv2.1 but > > the main application seems to be GPLv2+ - I've asked on the fedora-legal > > mailing list for clarification... > > I'll clarify with upstream. I looked in common and what was in the upstream > Moblin specfile. I suspect its a mix of both because of what the other > moblin-panel packages use. According to the response from Tom Callaway on the fedora-legal list ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-November/msg00027.html ) you can either mention both licenses or just use "GPLv2+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review