Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-20 16:35:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I think it would be wrong to add dependencies for packages only available on > rpmfusion. I'm not sure about it, but I think it would be impossible to install > this package without having enabled rpmfusion. Yes, I fully agree now.... ;-) > I think it's better to make the dependencies as good as possible. If there are > any products which use this packages they should care about the required > dependencies. Hm, I think I disagree with this statement. IMHO the packages in Fedora should follow these rules: - the requirements of a package should include all prerequisites which are necessary to use the package (this includes e.g. the native libraries which are used by the late binding in C#) - if a package would not be usable without another one, it must be included in the requirements - a Fedora package must be installable on a Fedora-only system Given these two rules, there would be only the one solution to exclude these bindings which need native libs from rpmfusion completely and - if needed - package them in rpmfusion. I know, this would somehow "split" the taoframework package - but IMHO this would be the best solution. Do you think this would be a reasonable way? Otherwise the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review