Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #25 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-19 23:22:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > I have rolled back the spec bump, changed the spelling, and uploaded new > > specs/SRPMS (now built on my F12 machine). > > Actually when I said "This doesn't need a new spec bump right away", I meant > that there was no need to up the release tag and create and post new .specs and > .srpms until after the next major review (i.e. just keep of a note of it until > you do the next major revision). I didn't mean rolling back the release tag to > version 1. Sorry if I wasn't clearer about that. > > Actually you should *always* update the release tag when you post a new > version. So actually technically this should have been version 1.0.8-3. And of course for each new release tag, document that in the %changelog, then it makes it easier to diff the old and new specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review