Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 --- Comment #3 from Matt T. Proud <matt.proud@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-16 22:19:12 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Thank you for the prompt feedback. I have gone ahead and incorporated your suggestions: - Patch naming, - Privileges, - Using %{_datadir}/%{name} due to the item being architecture-independent, - Ownership of the %{_datadir}/%{name}, and - The format-agnosticness of the manual pages. I did make an error in the URL for the SRPM supra. The correct address is http://www.nerp.net/~khanreaper/slack-0.15.2-2.fc11.src.rpm. Let me know if there's anything else I can do! - M. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review