Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |433512 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-15 21:29:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - BR: python-setuptools is enough not -devel This is my first python package and I believe you, but what about http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools ? (I "stole" the spec file from yum-presto fwiw;) So I think the Packaging Guidelines need updating then? > - Could not download the source -> 404, had to unpack the src.rpm Thanks - fixed. > yum-langpacks.spec:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py* > yum-langpacks.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py* I can use _prefix but I think this is basically correct for yum-plugins. At least other plugins packages are doing the same thing. > yum-langpacks.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.2-1 > ['0.1.3-1.fc11', '0.1.3-1'] fixing > yum-langpacks.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py 0644 /bin/env thanks - fixed. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks-0.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1808500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review