[Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108





--- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros <stjepan.gros@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-15 14:56:07 EDT ---
Ok, I fixed all except the default configuration part. The problem is that it
is very hard to create default configuration that would allow vuurmuur to start
without any user intervention. The reason is that at least one rule has to be
defined (otherwise, vuurmuur refuses to start), which, in turn, requires that
at least one interface is defined. This is very hard to do in general case.

So, I added some configuration files, and switched services from shared
directory to /etc/vuurmuur but the user has to start vuurmuur_conf tool to
create initial configuration. What I can do is include check in init.d script
to notify user about this in case it tries to start vuurmuur without
configuring it first.

Is this OK?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]