Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros <stjepan.gros@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-15 14:56:07 EDT --- Ok, I fixed all except the default configuration part. The problem is that it is very hard to create default configuration that would allow vuurmuur to start without any user intervention. The reason is that at least one rule has to be defined (otherwise, vuurmuur refuses to start), which, in turn, requires that at least one interface is defined. This is very hard to do in general case. So, I added some configuration files, and switched services from shared directory to /etc/vuurmuur but the user has to start vuurmuur_conf tool to create initial configuration. What I can do is include check in init.d script to notify user about this in case it tries to start vuurmuur without configuring it first. Is this OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review