Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #3 from Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-08 20:03:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It seems that Linux Wacom is still active (they released 0.8.4 very recently). > Could you, please, add more details about the reasons, which led to the fork?, Ping (upstream linuxwacom maintainer) and I agreed that a fork is best for getting a cleaner and more efficient X driver. linuxwacom has become a hard-to maintain piece of code, with the X driver trying to support everything from XFree86 3 up to X.Org Server 1.6. I have the experience with X drivers, so the first thing we agreed on was to ditch pre X server 1.6 support and go with 1.7 and later. in terms of future development, linuxwacom and xf86-input-wacom will be developed in parallel when it comes to new hardware support and general bug fixes. linuxwacom will not see the updates to server 1.7, so any attempt of supporting this in F12 will be a messy patch set (like it is now already). note that Ping is a kernel developer responsible for new hardware support. The X driver should not have any special hardware dependencies - that's what the kernel is for. the forked driver is a major step towards that. New specfile coming up in a minute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review