Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #8 from Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-08 10:52:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > That's the COPYING file, which I already said I'm going to include. > Then please do so now. I already said I will. Since I'm doing this on my free time I'll do so at my earliest convenience. > In other words: keep your upstream and Fedora packager's role separate. > I.e. first release a tarball, then package this tarball for Fedora, not vice > versa. What's the point of releasing a package that doesn't meet Fedora's standards? I would need to make another release just after receiving more feedback. I'll rather wait. > > The > > question was about source-code files. In Michael's words: "confirm the > > licensing in the source files". > > I can only guess what he meant. My guess would be, he is asking you to add a > copyright/license disclaimer line to each of the source files. I don't see anything on the license that *requires* to add copyright/license disclaimers to each file. It says it's *desirable*, but ultimately an "upstream" choice. > However, this also is upstream business. Yes, it's "upstream" business, but if it was *only* upstream business, then you would have accepted this packages already, and you clearly have issues with it that "upstream" (me) doesn't have strong feelings about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review