Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531648 --- Comment #1 from Andrew McNabb <amcnabb@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-29 12:38:03 EDT --- 1) Probably the sane thing to do would be to call it easy_install-3, right? That's what has been done with most of the other tools for Python 3, and it looks like python-setuptools-devel installs easy_install-2.6. It seems to me that it would be fine for the Python 3 version to only install under the versioned name. 2) I assume that when the brp-python-bytecompile patch is in, the __python def will go away, right? 3) The python_sitelib stuff looks a bit hackish, but there might not be any better way to do it. 4) I still think it's insane that easy_install is in the -devel subpackage. I know that this is a carryover from the python2 packaging, but I think it's worth reconsidering. If I recall correctly, the rationale was that easy_install depended on some files from python-devel, or something like that. Anyway, I think it's a disservice to users that the setuptools package doesn't include easy_install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review