[Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861





--- Comment #12 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-29 12:30:49 EDT ---
>> The spec has 30 sources and 15 patches without any indication if they have been
>> pushed upstream.  
> 
> Afaik they were rejected

Probably. I worked a bit on packaging 10 (hmm ... scary!) years ago
(http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/conectiva/atualizacoes/8/RPMS/cyrus-imapd-devel-static-2.0.17-1U80_1cl.i386.html),
and back then upstream wasn't that "open". But the license change might be an
indication that things have changed now?

> some sources are additional modules/tools that upstream is not interested in

That might be. But there are so many of them that it almost deserves a real
home. Fedora CVS is not a good upstream. Perhaps upstream could be convinced to
carry it in its contrib folder?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]