Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #12 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-29 12:30:49 EDT --- >> The spec has 30 sources and 15 patches without any indication if they have been >> pushed upstream. > > Afaik they were rejected Probably. I worked a bit on packaging 10 (hmm ... scary!) years ago (http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/conectiva/atualizacoes/8/RPMS/cyrus-imapd-devel-static-2.0.17-1U80_1cl.i386.html), and back then upstream wasn't that "open". But the license change might be an indication that things have changed now? > some sources are additional modules/tools that upstream is not interested in That might be. But there are so many of them that it almost deserves a real home. Fedora CVS is not a good upstream. Perhaps upstream could be convinced to carry it in its contrib folder? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review