Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-27 04:45:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > > @xandry: I changed this using %attr(). Now rpmlint does not complain. I've > > > installed this package and file permissions are correct. > > First, I'm afraid, that you should package it as is, w/o changing permissions. > > There is one possible user case - running mpdscribble as a server on an iron > > with multiple user accounts, and server's admin would like to hide last.fs > > account settings from others. > You're absolutely right. But on the other hand rpmlint is mandatory step in > package approval. So how are we going to deal with it? In this particular case we may ignore this rpmlint message. > > Please, note, that %{_initddir} is unavailable on RHEL/CentOS, so if you plan > > to push the application into EPEL also, then you should consider using > > %{_initrddir} instead. > Hmm. This is the reason I used %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d Then you should (for consistency) change %files section. Instead of %{_initddir}/%{name} you should add %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/%{name} > So I'd rather keep %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d but if you insist - I'll change > it to %{_initddir}. No, I'm not insisting here - feel free to decide which one to choose by yourself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review