[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548





--- Comment #3 from Mihai Limbășan <mihai@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-19 08:59:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Package looks sane, but any reason why you want to keep
> the static library?

Not really, no - I just aped the behavior of some other mingw32-* library
packages. Can be dropped any time (from the other dependent packages as well.)

> That's simply not supported.  Koji might happen to run on (eg) x86-64
> or PPC builder, where Wine either can't be installed or couldn't run even
> if it could be installed.  Don't worry about it.  

Thanks, I thought I was missing something. I'm still running all tests I can
manually - e.g., working on mingw32-xz now, and some edge case tests fail
depending on the MINGW32_CFLAGS you pick, which would seem to point to some
compiler problems, so properly passing all tests should be a priority.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]