[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548


Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rjones@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-19 08:16:24 EDT ---
Package looks sane, but any reason why you want to keep
the static library?

(In reply to comment #1)
> Wasn't able to figure out how to run make check in mock. The tests complete
> successfully in ~/rpmbuild, but since they generate Wiin32-PE .exe files the
> mock run croaks due to the missing Wine binary loader, and I'd really, really
> want to avoid having a mingw package BR Wine.  

That's simply not supported.  Koji might happen to run on (eg) x86-64
or PPC builder, where Wine either can't be installed or couldn't run even
if it could be installed.  Don't worry about it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]