Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #49 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-19 00:21:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > Well, > * About -rgmanager subpackage > - Is -rgmanager part really needed? From the description in the spec file > currently this subpackage can be rebuilt only for F-10, which is about to > be EOL and on F-11/12/13 this cannot be supported. So the problem here is not in drbd, but an implementation/integration bug in resource-agents/rgmanager. To make the long story short, the 2 conflicting files will have to vanish from resource-agents/rgmanager but because of that error it will take a bit of time. The authoritative package will be -rgmanager from drbd. Florian was kind enough to give us (upstream for rgmanager/resource-agents) time to fix it properly and avoid an upstream/fedora packaging specific change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review