Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx |dave@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-16 16:29:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Koji: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1750409 > > This is a little premature - I'm waiting on a final confirmation from upstream > before calling it official. Well, this one is good ⨒⨒⨒ APPROVED ⨒⨒⨒ (Note that I'm not asking you to push it at once, just confirming this particular version is good enough for Fedora, and that you can push it or something similar when you feel ready. You can still wait for upstream confirmation or ask new questions here. But I don't think I should block you from now on) When you feel ready, you can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review