Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-09 09:48:32 EDT --- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag >It states there that using the dist tag isn't mandatory; we wouldn't mind >leaving it out. Objections? yes, you will have the same package for fedora 10, 11, 12 etc..., and without dist-tag your rpm will have the same name, when someone upgrades from f10 to f11 then your package won't get upgraded because it's have the same name, and using dist-tag you will have foo.fc10 foo.fc11 foo.fc11 > foo.fc10 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros > > Can you be a bit more specific, i.e. outline how our spec violates this) > for example /usr/sbin/drbd-overview becomes %{_sbindir}/drbd-overview -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review