Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #13 from LINBIT <partner@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-09 09:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I don't think if a generic rpm will work (one rpm for all distros) > > I think you will need to create a fedora specific spec file. You opinion is noted. Please let us know which parts of the spec you find objectionable in that regard, and we will see if and how we can change things. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag It states there that using the dist tag isn't mandatory; we wouldn't mind leaving it out. Objections? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define OK, point taken. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Again, point taken. I'll add %{release}. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros Can you be a bit more specific, i.e. outline how our spec violates this) > ---> also try to build your package with koji > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 Will do once we get the spec in better shape. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review