Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Praveen K Paladugu <praveen_paladugu@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(praveen_paladugu@ | |dell.com) | --- Comment #4 from Praveen K Paladugu <praveen_paladugu@xxxxxxxx> 2009-10-06 11:20:55 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Since the release number wasn't changed, I thought the new sources were not available yet. Few more things to take care of: 1) #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/sblim-tools-libra-devel-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-tools-libra-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please add some documentation to doc package. 2) The devel package seems to own /usr/include/sblim directory. I suggest a "Requires:" be added to a package which owns this directory. This is just to make sure that the same directory is not owned by different packages. sblim-cmpi-base-devel seems to be a good choice. Please suggest if you have any other package in mind. Please bump up the release number of the package to avoid further confusion. This package is good to go after handling the above comments. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review