Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |martin.gieseking@xxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2009-10-04 15:21:25 EDT --- With the latest SRPM I was also able to build the package successfully. It was indeed quite obvious that the problem could be caused by %{?_smp_mflags}. Next time I'll know better. :) Anyway, the package looks good now. I couldn't find any further issues to be fixed. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/volpack-* volpack.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libvolpack.so.1.0.4 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx volpack-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Both warnings can be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - BSD license (3 clause variant) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File(s) containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum volpack-1.0c7.tgz* e8e2f8d4fcc569417aef51d429556068d9205060 volpack-1.0c7.tgz e8e2f8d4fcc569417aef51d429556068d9205060 volpack-1.0c7.tgz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726997 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs packaged [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' no .pc files [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - .la files removed [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - doc package [.] SHOULD: .pc files should be placed in a -devel pkg. - no .pc files ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review