Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-02 07:49:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > There is one unwritten guideline above all others. It's called "consider common > sense". Only after real guidelines. > If a -devel package included a couple of "man 3" pages for its API headers and > also at least one large PDF file or a huge HTML tree, would you move _all_ %doc > files into a separate -doc package? Man file must stay in main package I though, not in -devel. > No. Nothing in the guidelines says you must > decide between either -devel OR -doc. You are free to move the large files into > -doc and keep other documentation files in -devel. It's the obvious solution. > And convenient, too. Just as you're free to put further non-development > oriented documentation files into other sub-packages. I don't known really. I ask in devel ml: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00109.html > The original idea to create a -examples package for only six tiny source files > was a weird and unpractical idea, and I think now you just don't want to let > loose. That's why you show resistance. ;) What? Loose? What loose?? I'm 2 times remade it as you want! But also I want do work as best as can. I only search best way. > Exactly. :-) Don't treat them as good examples. Why? I try "consider common sense". ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review