Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-24 12:21:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > So this is just a rename review request? I'll do a quick runthrough. Yes it is just a rename review request. > > The Obsoletes: and Provides: done > > There are a couple of provides which look a bit odd. I think that for some > bizarre reason the automatic dependency finder actually parses "package" > statements in some verilog source (installed as documentation) as perl > "package" statements, and so you end up with the bogus "perl(imp_test_pkg)" and > "perl(mypackage)". That's pretty bad behavior from rpmbuild almost certainly > worthy of a bug, but you'll still need to filter those dependencies. > Unfortunately you can't use the general dependency filtering mechanism just > introduced because this package is arch-specific. Perhaps the mechanism at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides > will work for you. done > > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. I'm doing my package reviews regularly :) Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl-3.213-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review