Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-23 07:16:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Just going back over some of these older tickets. I wonder it is permissible > for us to distribute the sources of those sample files that you have to > explicitly not include in the package due to licensing restrictions. Actually, these messages are just a leftover from my experiments (I tried to download these files and plan to add them to the tarball before realizing that this is illegal). Yes, we able to distribute srpm, since it doesn't contain non-redistributive stuff. Ok, returning to this ticket: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c-0.9.21-4.fc11.src.rpm I just removed confusing messages about asn1-files, which are not present in tarball and cannot be redistributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review