Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Alex Musolino <musolinoa@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musolinoa@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Alex Musolino <musolinoa@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-23 05:33:34 EDT --- Hi Shakthi, I have a few comments: - The versioned shared libraries should not be in the devel package as they are required by the snacc binary itself. (The *.so symlinks, however, should remain in the devel package). - The *.ans1 files are also required by snacc and so should be moved out of the devel package. - Some of the documentation (*.tex and *.bib) refers to the c-lib and c++-lib APIs (these should go in snacc-devel) and some refer to the use of various binaries in the snacc package (these should go in snacc). - The C/C++ examples should go in devel package (they aren't being packaged at the moment). - The C/C++ header files for the c-lib and c++-lib should go into the devel package. - There's a spelling mistake in the description (s/dample/sample/). Another idea might be to create libsnacc and libsnacc-devel packages for the c and c++ libraries and put just the binaries in snacc. In fact, I think this would be the optimal solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review