Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea <ismael@xxxxxxxx> 2009-09-21 18:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > A few comments, as I wait for this to build: > > Parallel make would really be nice. Is it not working? I note the firefox > spec has some bizarre code to conditionally use a limited parallel make. I've just tried with the parallel flag and it didn't liked. For writing this spec I've based on the seamonkey one, which seems a bit outdated, BTW. > The version does not seem correct. If upstream releases 0.8 (as their web > pages indicate that they will) then you will need to use an epoch as 0.8 is > less than 0.8a4. The proper way to do this is explained in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages: > kompozer-0.8-0.1.a4 Fine! Done. > Unfortunately the package has failed to build for me, in mock, on x86_64 > rawhide: > [...] > > I'm afraid I do not completely understand what's gone wrong. I think it's the > "-Wl,/usr/lib64" there, as that passes /usr/lib64 directly to ld and I don't > think there's any reason to pass a directory name without an option flag to ld. I've tried to add x64 support asked by a user but my system is x32 so is hard to detect troubles like this :-/ The updated spec: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review