Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-09-20 05:45:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Then maybe you'd be willing to perform the review? > > Done. Since I'm not a sponsor you still need to seek one. Maybe you should > review other packages too. Did you create other packages? You could even send a > mail to fedora-devel describing your package and what you have done etc. > > The more you tell about you and your package the earlier you will find a > sponsor. Is this a joke? :D I'm a sponsor myself, with 136 reviews. Most of the review bugs are by people who have been sponsored long ago and have packaging rights. Only the ones marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR need sponsors to (formally) review them. I see you have acquired sponsoree status just five days ago, and you clearly have not understood yet completely how the package review process works. ** You really should go through the review checklist in the review bug (here). It's not just for me or you, it's also for other people who look at the reviews. A simple "Looks OK" is sloppy reviewing, since it's very likely you have forgot to check something. And it doesn't tell other people that you have really went through everything. Learn to walk before you run, OK? :) PS. Setting fedora-review to + is not enough, since anyone can remove or write over the flag. When you a package passes the review, write APPROVED in the comment field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review