Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #18 from Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-16 19:52:51 EDT --- The answer to the .la question is that apr-1-config script has an option --link-libtool, which returns the .la file. If the .la file is not shipped, software that uses this option will fail to build. Ditto for apr-util. Upstream project defines "source compatibility" here: http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html#source If .la file is removed, we'll be breaking that versioning rule set by upstream, because some application will fail to build against such apr/apr-util package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review