Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost@xxxxxxx 2006-09-20 14:34 EST ------- Excuses for my very late reply. But I missed the email and thought that no-one had looked at this package again.... (In reply to comment #14) > Why is the debuginfo package disabled? Actually, I don't know. Someone told me to do so, because an empty package was generated. I tried without that code, and that empty package isn't there anymore. So' I'll remove it. > Manual copying of the readme and license is not needed with the %doc macro in > the %files section which copies automatically. Merely specify %doc > lazarus/COPYING* etc. Fixed > You can drop the Requires: gdk-pixbuf, gtk+ and glibc, because rpm figures out > the library dependencies by itself. (rpm -q --requires to see them) Fixed In the meantime a new version is released, so I updated the version to 0.9.18. And it seems that rpmbuild doesn't strip the executables. The RPM is HUGE now. Where can I find more information about strip and rpmbuild? SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.18-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review