Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #31 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-14 20:08:49 EDT --- And the rpmlint result from the binary RPMs: $ rpmlint gnustep-base* gnustep-base.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Libraries/gnustep-base/Versions/1.18/Resources/NSTimeZones/.README.swp gnustep-base.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/gdomap 01755 gnustep-base-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. hidden-file: that should be deleted in %install gdomap: is there a reason for the sudo? The documentation warning is.. interesting. Could you see how gnustep-make does its documentation subpackage, and create a gnustep-base-doc subpackage? It'd be easier than gnustep-make's, since gnustep-make will already be installed when you start the build process (e.g. you can do 'make -C Documentation' in %build, not delay it to %install) Also, there is the 'Examples' directory. That should probably be not be built, but packaged as part of gnustep-base-devel, complete with the relevant makefiles, e.g. %files devel ... %doc Examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review