[Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065


Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |martin.gieseking@xxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #27 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx>  2009-09-08 14:04:09 EDT ---
Here comes the review.

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
givaro.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgivaro.so.0.0.4
exit@xxxxxxxxxxx
givaro-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
givaro-devel.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/givaro/givaro-makefile
0644 /bin/sh
givaro-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.

- call of exit() can be ignored according to comment #25
- missing docs in -devel and -static is OK
- #!/bin/sh in makefile already removed according to comment #23


---------------------------------
keys used in following checklist:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    - GPLv2 boilerplates missing (upstream notified) 

[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: files containing the text of the license(s) must be included in %doc.
    - COPYING added to %doc of base package

[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    - md5 hash is f0b754ee54bcac0e866f2979b57393ba

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms.
    - builds in koji
      https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662967

[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
    - no locales

[+] MUST: Packages containing .so files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
    - base package contains libgivaro.so.0.0.4
    - ldconfig called in %post and %postun

[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
    - package not relocatable

[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
    - givaro-makefile contains #!/bin/sh that must be removed
    - already done according to comment #23 

[+] MUST: %clean section must contain rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
    - no large docs

[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
    - libgivaro.a

[.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
    - no .pc files

[+] MUST: .so without suffix must go in a -devel package.
    - libgivaro.so

[+] MUST: devel packages must require  %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
    - .la file removed in %install

[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
    - no GUI

[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.


[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
    - builds in mock

[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
    - I tested some of the functions provided by the library and they worked as
expected
    - givaro-config prints the correct flags

[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
    call of ldconfig in %post and %postun

[+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
    - subpackage -static requires base and -devel package
    - Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} is redundant

------------------------
The package is APPROVED.
------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]