Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-28 14:07:21 EDT --- > Well, I don't know. It needs the clirr plugins, so it isn't going to build at > the moment. I must admit I find maven somewhat opaque, and am not overly keen > on packaging clirr. If it gets packaged, I will update however. I've had a look, and clirr just isn't going to happen for Fedora. First, it's a dead project. Second, it only builds with maven1, NOT maven2. But it's not needed for building the manual, anyway, is it? I think we can just patch the clirr-related parts out of build.xml. > >Is there a reason for not building with gcj? > Sorry, not sure why this needs to be done. If licencing is the concern, Sun's > javac has been free (as in software) for quite a while now, I believe since F9. > I note that packages such as maven2-plugin-release use OpenJDK in preference to > gcj... Last I heard, OpenJDK on PPC/PPC64 is 1 or 2 orders of magnitude slower than gcj-generated code. GCJ support is not a MUST item, so I won't block the review on this point. Personally, I'd be happy to see gcj-compiled code go away and all Java packages become noarch. For that to happen, though, the speed problems with OpenJDK need to be fixed. I don't know who is working on that or what the status is. So, going over the list again, java-devel still isn't a BR, but it's pulled in by ant, so I guess that's okay. Everything else is fixed, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review