Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-26 02:21:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > lightsquid.spec: W: no-%build-section > --- I'm stumped at the minute > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 1 warnings. One just needs to add an empty %build section if there is nothing to build. reason > lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation > ---I'm new to this game so not sure what initiative to take I know this error > was ok for a package I did I assume its the same in this case It's OK as long as there's nothing relevant to ship as the documentation, and as long as there is no duplication between interdependent packages. For instance if the main package ships COPYING, the -devel package that requires the main package doesn't need to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review