Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-21 07:34:02 EDT --- Strange - I hadn't noticed that LICENSE file contains the text of GPLv2. But there's also a little chunk at the head of LICENSE explaining the terms of Perl itself (i.e. GPL+ or Artistic) and the license in the code itself (Object.pm and State.pm) is also "same terms as Perl itself". I believe that means it really is only "GPL+ or Artistic" and that the GPLv2 license text is for information only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review