[Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-15 14:39 EST -------
You're the license czar so if you feel comfortable importing this then I have no
objections.

* source files match upstream:
   b8ce9617527a999c85d54fc8a4e88ebc  File-MMagic-XS-0.08.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   XS.so()(64bit)
   perl(File::MMagic::XS) = 0.08
   perl-File-MMagic-XS = 0.08-2.fc6
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(File::MMagic)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=2, Tests=11,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr +  0.01 csys =  0.07 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]