Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #3 from Joshua Rosen <bjrosen@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-10 08:40:26 EDT --- This is my first package. I generated the .spec file using rpmdev-newspec and then edited it with Xemacs, the tabs look fine to me. rpmbuild doesn't seem to work without the mkdirs, is it expecting them in Makefile? My license is the original BSD. I have advertising on my sys_basher website for my products and services but there is none in the program or in the source package. The program requires lm_sensors, is rpmbuild smart enough to figure that out from the source code? I'm the author of sys_basher, I wrote it to test hardware reliability and performance. As far as I know it's the only Linux native hardware diagnostic available. The unique feature of sys_basher is that it's multi-threaded which allows it to run CPU, Memory and IO tests on all of the cores in a system simultaneously. I've written it to operate all of the subsystems at their maximum possible speeds which ensures that the greatest amount of heat is generated, the maximum power is used, and the maximum switching noise created. Sys_basher can find RAM errors that memtest86 can't. I've been designing computers for 30 years, currently I sell high-speed commnication IP for ASICs and FPGAs. In the early 90s I had a commercial hardware diagnostic for the Mac which was sold as both as an end user utility and was used by Mac board manufacturers, I sold that product off in the mid-90s. I'm attaching my current spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review