Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-10 02:51:38 EDT --- Blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. To get this package in Fedora you will need to get a sponsor. I can sponsor you if you show me that you know the Fedora guidelines, most importantly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets To do this you need to perform a couple of informal package reviews of packages of other people. You should also make another submission. ** A few notes: - The tabbing of the spec file does not look sane. Please fix it. - License tag is incorrect, should be BSD with advertising. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List - Package does not build in mock; you are missing at least BuildRequires: ncurses-devel. - Explicit Requires: are not allowed, so drop the Requires line altogether. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - You shouldn't need to mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} as this should be done by make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review