Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-13 13:53 EST ------- 1.: Just copied from main filesystem pkg, but 1.0.0 also would fit. 2.: Well...are there really major, minor or micro version upgrades? Adding a new language could be used for bumping micro, bumping minor only for bigger changes, e.g. adding new tree or maybe with every Fedora release, e.g. 1.6.x would be FC6. I wouldn't abuse major version for Fedora release, but maybe also another thought, e.g. 6.x.y for FC6. 3.: Agree, +1 4.: No, please don't do that. Not everybody installing the filesystem-i18n package is interested having a empty KDE directory i18n tree, when KDE isn't installed; which is case especially on servers. But if I have to accept that KDE i18n will get part of filesystem-i18n, then the i18n directories from %{_mandir} have to be added, too. When candidate for FE and until it receives FC, I would like to maintain it in FE - if possible... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review