Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-05 22:02:28 EDT --- rpath is indeed generally a 64-bit thing. Libtool somehow knows not to add /usr/lib to rpath, but can't figure out not to add /usr/lib64. That's libtool for you. However, when you add hacks like those sed calls over libtool, it's best to also add a comment indicating why it's necessary. You should not duplicate those doc files between the main and -devel packages. Are you sure the license is GPLv2 only? It looks like LGPLv2+ to me. The COPYING file contains the LGPL and the source code and upstream web site all says: * [...] GNU Lesser General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either * version 2.1 of the License, or any later version. which is what we call LGPLv2+. Fix that up and I can go ahead and do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review