[Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896





--- Comment #4 from Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-31 02:47:49 EDT ---
Following lengthy review discussions with Eric Sandeen (thanks Eric)
and several PCP community developers, and after working thru errors
and warnings reported by 'rpmlint', the changes listed below have been
committed to the 'dev' branch in my tree at
  git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git

For review purposes, the Fedora specific spec and SRPM for PCP have been
copied up to :

Spec URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm

Most of the changes made so far are to the Fedora RPM spec itself - these
need to be reconciled, where possible, with the community RPM spec.

The remaining changes are mostly to silence rpmlint:

* pcp-libs.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
To fix, need to add a "%post libs" scriptlet to call to ldconfig

* pcp-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.3
Nothing can really be done about this - the exit() context is well
known and understood.

* pcp.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
Several demo binaries are being installed in /usr/share/pcp/demo.
I can move these elsewhere, if requested. These binaries are not
used by the PCP core functionality.

* pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
Several headers and some 'C' files in PCP are actually configuration
files. Discussed with the PCP community and they agree to leave these
as-is.

* pcp.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/pcp
Well, it actually isn't a config file - we want it unconditionally
updated after an upgrade. Same for /etc/pcp.env

* pcp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pcp
PCP has it's own log management system, see pmlogger_daily(1)

* pcp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod
* pcp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
This could be avoided with %ghost directive, if needed.

* pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmproxy
* pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmie
* pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcp
rpmlint suggests we need to set up a lock file in /var/lock/subsys.

Changes commited so far to git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git
(most recent changes are listed first). Please clone my git tree
if you want to see the patches  :

commit 5dc76a384254b3a0b1a72ff1be5faec042effa73
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 15:44:40 2009 +1000

        RPM spec specifically for the Fedora Project.

        Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 1274605472853400f4297439c433a05829735a64
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 15:40:58 2009 +1000

    tweak configure to move PCP_BINADM_DIR out of /usr/share, into /usr/lib.
    Arch dependent binaries should not be installed below /usr/share.

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 17700e2bdaa0060178c3d025edb92280f36451f6
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 11:47:39 2009 +1000

    delete unneeded explicit script interpreter to keep rpmlint happy

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit b971772c281a5aff6408981e7086cbfa4bcee6ba
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 11:33:20 2009 +1000

    pmpost does not really need to be setuid

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 0a4cd4b8bfe44265bdccfb93db5e19c28c796f79
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 11:11:48 2009 +1000

    Nuke migrate_pcp_var_dir, no longer needed

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit bf98168e8a7cea7697497f4972dd835fa10e29b6
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jul 30 18:25:12 2009 +1000

    default chkconfig off for all PCP services

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3baf8e7a6491c9533a1b0ff00c6d711a32677536
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Jul 27 09:32:57 2009 +1000

    take -fstack-protector-all back out again since it's only supported with
newer compilers. Probably should add a configure test for it at some stage

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 0c1b4b2f4bd9b0759964fb056a1469b2dd052ce6
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jul 22 17:02:40 2009 +1000

    Tweak RPM dependency rules for 2.x -> 3.x upgrades and
    massage the PCP RPM spec to reduce rpmlint noise.

    Also added -fstack-protector-all to Linux PCFLAGS.

    On branch 3.0.0:
     modified:   build/rpm/pcp.spec.in
     modified:   src/include/builddefs.in

    Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit ff6cfff7845a832ab3b0affe19c6ffa33293bc93
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@fletch.(none)>
Date:   Fri Jul 10 14:36:29 2009 +1000

    move pcp.conf into libs and check for pcp-devel in PMDAs that ship a
Makefile

commit 728c61eb0aa0ebe9bf3b4096696adfc5b14abf39
Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@fletch.(none)>
Date:   Thu Jul 9 17:33:12 2009 +1000

    split RPM packaging into pcp, pcp-libs and pcp-devel, bump version to 3.0.0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]