[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus
Alias: evolution-brutus

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-11 10:20 EST -------
--------------------------------------------------
I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of
sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package.
--------------------------------------------------

1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :

* Timestamps
  - These packages include many text files and preserving timestamps
    is then preferable. Try to keep timestamps (can this package
    accept 'make INSTALL="install -c -p" install'?)

* File and Directory Ownership
  - The following directories are not owned by any packages.
    /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus/
    /usr/share/idl/brutus/

2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
   = Nothing.

3. Other things I have noticed :
   - Well, %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 perhaps means:
     Conflicts: evolution < 2.7
     Conflicts: evolution >= 2.9

mock build for FE-6 devel i386 is okay.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]