Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-11 10:20 EST ------- -------------------------------------------------- I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. -------------------------------------------------- 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps - These packages include many text files and preserving timestamps is then preferable. Try to keep timestamps (can this package accept 'make INSTALL="install -c -p" install'?) * File and Directory Ownership - The following directories are not owned by any packages. /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus/ /usr/share/idl/brutus/ 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed : - Well, %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 perhaps means: Conflicts: evolution < 2.7 Conflicts: evolution >= 2.9 mock build for FE-6 devel i386 is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review